Block Builders

Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
5 min read
Office setting

In Ethereum's proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, various components have emerged to optimize the performance, security, and economics of the network. Among these components, block builders play a crucial role that intertwines with various operational mechanics of Ethereum, touching on Miner Extractable Value (MEV), Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS), and the broader ecosystem of decentralized finance (DeFi).

 

What are Block Builders?

Block builders are entities responsible for assembling transactions into blocks on blockchains, particularly in Ethereum under the new PoS architecture. After the transition to PoS via Ethereum's Merge in September 2022, the traditional role of miners was replaced with validators. Validators propose new blocks based on the stakes they hold, but they do not always construct the actual blocks, this is where block builders come in. Block builders aggregate transactions from users and prioritize them based on various factors, including gas fees, transaction types, and more. Essentially, they are akin to a combination of transaction aggregators and block architects, tasked with determining the optimal arrangement of transactions that maximize throughput and miner incentives.

 

Why Are Block Builders Important?

Block builders hold significant importance in the Ethereum ecosystem for several reasons:

1. Efficiency: By decentralizing the process of block creation, block builders improve the efficiency of transaction processing. Validators can spend more time validating and proposing blocks rather than focusing on determining the best sequence for transactions.

2. Maximizing Revenue: Block builders can maximize the fees collected for including transactions in a block, thus potentially increasing their profitability. By strategically selecting transactions with higher gas fees or those that are part of lucrative DeFi operations, they can court additional income—to both themselves and the validators.

3. Enhanced Fairness: The role of block builders can help align incentives more evenly across diverse network participants. Through better device-earnable opportunities and addressing the potential for harmful manipulation, they can enhance overall ecosystem fairness and resilience.

4. Facilitation of MEV Strategies: MEV, or Maximum Extractable Value (previously known as Miner Extractable Value), refers to the potential profit that block builders (or miners) can earn from their position in the transaction ordering process. Block builders can implement sophisticated strategies to capture MEV, thereby benefiting both themselves and the overall blockchain economy.

 

MEV-Boost and Its Relation to Block Builders

MEV-Boost is a protocol that plays a significant role in facilitating the interaction between validators and block builders in Ethereum's PoS framework. In a typical scenario without MEV-Boost, all transaction ordering and block creation would rest on a validator's shoulders, potentially leading to less optimal transaction arrangements. MEV-Boost creates a marketplace where block builders can submit blocks to validators. Validators, then, can choose the most profitable block to propose to the network. This creates a competitive environment for block building, ensuring that the most efficient block structures are chosen for the network.

This yields several advantages:

1. Economic Efficiency: The competition among block builders tends to elevate overall economic efficiency by securing the best value blocks for validators, ensuring that throughput and transaction fees are maximized.

2. Dynamic Market: MEV-Boost encourages a dynamic market where block builders innovate ways to capture MEV, ultimately enhancing the competitiveness of the Ethereum ecosystem.

3. Reduction of Centralization Risks: By allowing multiple block builders to submit blocks, MEV-Boost diminishes the monopolistic tendencies that could arise if a few validators controlled both transaction selection and block production.

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS)

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a concept that advocates for separating the roles of block proposing and block building in Ethereum. Simply put, a proposer (a validator) is responsible for maintaining network consensus and deciding the next block to add to the blockchain, while block builders focus purely on how to structure that block with transactions.

1. Operational Independence: The separation allows for an efficient allocation of network resources. Validators can focus on their primary responsibility—ensuring consensus—while block builders innovate around transaction ordering and value maximization.

2. Minimization of MEV Exploitation: With PBS, there is a clear distinction that diminishes potential exploitative behavior concerning MEV. Block builders are incentivized to build transactions that are fairer and more equitable since they are evaluated based on their competitive race in the market.

3. Innovation and Diversity: The PBS model encourages a broader ecosystem where various entities can act as block builders. This can lead to a diversity of strategies and solutions that would otherwise not be feasible in a centralized model.

Learn more about Proposer-Builder Separation here.

Block builders represent a transformative segment within Ethereum's proof-of-stake infrastructure. Their function enhances efficiency, generates economic value, and promotes decentralized fairness within transaction structures. Coupled with systems like MEV-Boost and frameworks like Proposer-Builder Separation, the role of block builders is crucial in shaping a sustainable and equitable ecosystem. The Ethereum community continues to learn and adapt through these innovations, balancing the need for performance and profitability while maintaining equitable opportunities for all participants. As the Ethereum ecosystem matures, the dynamics between block builders and validators will likely evolve, shaping the future of blockchain technology.

To learn more, view our list of Top Block Builders

Olivia Rhye
11 Jan 2022
5 min read